From owner-cvs-all Tue Sep 15 02:56:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA01386 for cvs-all-outgoing; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 02:56:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from mail.kt.rim.or.jp (mail.kt.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA01381 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 02:56:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp) Received: from moon.sky.rim.or.jp (ppp351.kt.rim.or.jp [202.247.140.51]) by mail.kt.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.6W-RIMNET-98-06-09) with ESMTP id SAA18375 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 18:56:23 +0900 (JST) Received: from sky.rim.or.jp (earth [192.168.1.2]) by moon.sky.rim.or.jp (8.8.7/3.5Wpl4/moon-1.0) with ESMTP id SAA13856 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 18:55:21 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <35FE38FE.E09093DD@sky.rim.or.jp> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 18:53:02 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [ja] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: committers Subject: Can we branch doc/ja/man? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk We are working in doc/ja/man for RELENG_2_2 branch now. But manpage diffs between RELENG_2_2 and HEAD is pretty big, so we started to prepare translation for 3.0-RELEASE. If 3.0-RELEASE is rolled out, many users will use RELENG_2_2 branch for a long time, so we should maintain manpage translation for RELENG_2_2 branch. I know doc tree in CVS repository should not have branch-point, but we want branches RELENG_2_2 and HEAD for that reason. What should we do? # BTW, books of translated manpage (section 1, 5, 8) will be published # in Japan (section 1 will be 9/25). # These are results of jpman project members' effort. Yay! -- Jun Kuriyama // kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp // kuriyama@FreeBSD.ORG