Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:47:12 +0100
From:      Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org>
To:        Ariff Abdullah <ariff@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, lists@stringsutils.com, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: No APM yet for AMD?
Message-ID:  <20060110094712.GB32102@poupinou.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060110050828.100b026a.ariff@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200512291412.19476.peter@wemm.org> <cone.1136052558.494842.28540.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <20060103155509.GE13887@poupinou.org> <cone.1136308365.970162.45107.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <20060103185047.GH13887@poupinou.org> <cone.1136387653.168993.62674.1000@zoraida.natserv.net> <20060104161842.GK13887@poupinou.org> <20060105005441.029835c1.ariff@FreeBSD.org> <43C2C6AB.5060605@root.org> <20060110050828.100b026a.ariff@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:08:28AM +0800, Ariff Abdullah wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:25:15 -0800
> Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> wrote:
> > 
> > I looked at the patch but had a hard time figuring out what the 
> > functional changes are.  Most of the changes are just using a 
> > convenience pointer to see the struct members and some style 
> > misformatting of the printf arguments.  (The second line of
> > indentation  needs to be 4 spaces indented, see style(9)).
> > 
> > What part of this patch is just the functional change?
> > 
> There are no functional changes at all. It simply trying to be more
> verbose (and forgiving), in case the ioctl did not return advance
> information (such as remaining time, so on) which I believe few ACPI
> bioses incapable of providing such info. In this case, it trying to
> calculate the percentage of remining battery capacity based on Last
> Full Capacity, which current acpiconf ignore.
> 
> # acpiconf -i 0 (without patch)
> Design capacity:        6000 mAh
> Last full capacity:     4000 mAh
> Technology:             secondary (rechargeable)
> Design voltage:         14800 mV
> Capacity (warn):        207 mAh
> Capacity (low):         125 mAh
> Low/warn granularity:   10 mAh
> Warn/full granularity:  25 mAh
> Model number:           JM-6
> Serial number:          0046713127
> Type:                   LION
> OEM info:               Hewlett-Packard
> State:                  not present
>                         ^^^^^^^^^^^
> Voltage:                unknown
> 
> # acpiconf -i 0 (patched)
> Design capacity:        6000 mAh
> Last full capacity:     4000 mAh
> Technology:             secondary (rechargeable)
> Design voltage:         14800 mV
> Capacity (warn):        207 mAh
> Capacity (low):         125 mAh
> Low/warn granularity:   10 mAh
> Warn/full granularity:  25 mAh
> Model number:           JM-6
> Serial number:          0046713127
> Type:                   LION
> OEM info:               Hewlett-Packard
> State:                  high 
>                         ^^^^
> Present rate:           unknown
> Remaining capacity:     100%
>                         ^^^^

Well, I would much prefer the remaining capacity still being
unknown in that case then.


-- 
Bruno Ducrot

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060110094712.GB32102>