From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 17 18:33:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E81940; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [91.121.60.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC90D286; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sulu.fritz.box (p5DDC1812.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.220.24.18]) by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3bwRvQ6h23zRKP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:33:54 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: ipv6_addrs_IF aliases in rc.conf(5) From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <20130712.160358.1330135778606339435.hrs@allbsd.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:33:54 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <20130712.135621.1408565802386368060.hrs@allbsd.org> <4c07217dc9200841dfd065a6d52849eb@mx1.enfer-du-nord.net> <20130712.160358.1330135778606339435.hrs@allbsd.org> To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:33:56 -0000 On 12.07.2013, at 09:03, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Please let me know if the existing configurations and/or the new > formats do not work. First of all: great work! It is that much easier to deal with aliases, now. There is only one minor issue, if at all: rc.conf: | ifconfig_em0_ipv6="inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::1 prefixlen 56" | ifconfig_em0_aliases="\ | inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::2-3 prefixlen 56 \ | inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::4 prefixlen 56 \ | inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::5-6/56" ifconfig: | inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::1 prefixlen 56 | inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::2 prefixlen 64 | inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::3 prefixlen 64 | inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::4 prefixlen 56 | inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::5 prefixlen 56 | inet6 dead:beef:1111:2222::6 prefixlen 56 Any combination of a range definition (2-3) *and* "prefixlen 56" is ignored whereas a range definition (5-6) *and* "/56" is interpreted as wanted. Well, that combination of a range and "prefix" isn't documented, thus I am not sure if that's an issue or a feature? With kind regards, Michael