From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 14 23:42:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945631065695 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE198FC1C for ; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBENgWPk050530; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:42:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mBENgWRD050527; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:42:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:42:31 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Roland Smith In-Reply-To: <20081214232501.GA2274@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20081215004206.M50522@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20081214143905.GA9275@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20081214154452.O49468@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081214150455.GA11318@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20081214163257.X49611@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081214232501.GA2274@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: send performance of rl(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:42:37 -0000 > :-( :-( :-) > > Swapping the rl(4) card for a xl(4) card did the trick. I can now > saturate the line in both directions. I think I'm going to scrap the > other rl(4) card in my machine as well and replace it with an fxp(4) card. no. realtek cards are not bad by design. this particular was broken