From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 07:40:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B514E106566B; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403898FC15; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8D26A601E; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:40:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.0x20.net Received: from mail.0x20.net ([217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTsw3yn4PnAm; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:40:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C0846A6006; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:40:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5C7egoL065131; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:40:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5C7egiG064761; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:40:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:40:42 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: ???????????? ???????????? Message-ID: <20120612074042.GG5592@e-new.0x20.net> References: <86fwa8szos.wl%momchil@xaxo.eu> <4FD000FE.6090505@FreeBSD.org> <4FD41340.3050003@FreeBSD.org> <86sje17jnx.wl%momchil@xaxo.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N77v08gAD5x46FmO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86sje17jnx.wl%momchil@xaxo.eu> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ULE Scheduler X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:40:44 -0000 --N77v08gAD5x46FmO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 09:06:26PM +0200, ???????????? ???????????? wrote: > At Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:23:44 -0700, > Doug Barton wrote: > >=20 > > On 06/06/2012 18:16, Doug Barton wrote: > > > On 06/06/2012 18:01, ???????????? ???????????? wrote: > > >> Is there some remedy? > > >=20 > > > Try the 4BSD scheduler. > >=20 > > Did you ever try this? Did it help? >=20 > I compiled the same kernel with the 4BSD scheduler today and it seems > that the processes jump accross cores too. My "eye" measure with "top" > fells like it's more stable and probably converges faster to a stable > state after "top" jumps accross cores. But in order to talk with > numbers, I need to replace "top" with somethings that dumps the > process number and the cpu id continuously in order to get some > statistics out of it, otherwise you can just forget all the things > that I have written. Is there an easy way to do that and are you > interested? Maybe sysutils/atop is useful here? --N77v08gAD5x46FmO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/W8noACgkQKc512sD3afguggCdFRZyZC6s1rtRlXIaXCZEAXp4 tdIAn3nLfuzyFjqmOksWO+PREntXBO0r =wtIt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --N77v08gAD5x46FmO--