Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:03:05 +0200 From: "wishmaster" <artemrts@ukr.net> To: =?WINDOWS-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru> Cc: Daniel Staal <DStaal@usa.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[4]: high load system do not take all CPU time Message-ID: <66225.1324832585.13952326456075091968@ffe17.ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <621310179.20111225181017@yandex.ru> References: <3A4BDC1D114ED73D51E019BA@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <1374625746.20111217102942@yandex.ru> <926001243.20111218194712@yandex.ru> <70251.1324270448.8859926110310105088@ffe16.ukr.net> <621310179.20111225181017@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Original message --- From: "Коньков Евгений" <kes-kes@yandex.ru> To: "wishmaster" <artemrts@ukr.net> Date: 25 December 2011, 18:10:22 Subject: Re[4]: high load system do not take all CPU time > Здравствуйте, wishmaster. > > Вы писали 19 декабря 2011 г., 6:54:08: > > > > w> --- Original message --- > w> From: "Коньков Евгений" <kes-kes@yandex.ru> > w> To: "Daniel Staal" <DStaal@usa.net> > w> Date: 18 December 2011, 19:47:40 > w> Subject: Re[2]: high load system do not take all CPU time > w> > w> > > > >> Здравствуйте, Daniel. > >> > >> Вы писали 18 декабря 2011 г., 17:52:00: > >> > >> DS> --As of December 17, 2011 10:29:42 AM +0200, Коньков Евгений > >> DS> is alleged to have said: > >> > >> >> How to debug why system do not use free CPU resouces? > >> >> > >> >> On this pictures you can see that CPU can not exceed 400tics > >> >> http://piccy.info/view3/2368839/c9022754d5fcd64aff04482dd360b5b2/ > >> >> http://piccy.info/view3/2368837/a12aeed98681ed10f1a22f5b5edc5abc/ > >> >> http://piccy.info/view3/2368836/da6a67703af80eb0ab8088ab8421385c/ > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On these pictures you can see that problems begin with trafic on re0 > >> >> when CPU load rise to "maximum" > >> >> http://piccy.info/view3/2368834/512139edc56eea736881affcda490eca/ > >> >> http://piccy.info/view3/2368827/d27aead22eff69fd1ec2b6aa15e2cea3/ > >> >> > >> >> But there is 25% CPU idle yet at that moment. > >> > >> DS> <snip> > >> > >> >># top -SIHP > >> >> last pid: 93050; load averages: 1.45, 1.41, 1.29 > >> >> up 9+16:32:06 10:28:43 237 processes: 5 running, 210 sleeping, 2 > >> >> stopped, 20 waiting > >> >> CPU 0: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 8.7% system, 17.7% interrupt, 72.8% idle > >> >> CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 9.1% system, 20.1% interrupt, 70.9% idle > >> >> CPU 2: 0.4% user, 0.0% nice, 9.4% system, 19.7% interrupt, 70.5% idle > >> >> CPU 3: 1.2% user, 0.0% nice, 6.3% system, 22.4% interrupt, 70.1% idle > >> >> Mem: 843M Active, 2476M Inact, 347M Wired, 150M Cache, 112M Buf, 80M Free > >> >> Swap: 4096M Total, 15M Used, 4080M Free > >> > >> DS> --As for the rest, it is mine. > >> > >> DS> You are I/O bound; most of your time is spent in interrupts. The CPU is > >> DS> dealing with things as fast as it can get them, but it has to wait for the > >> DS> disk and/or network card to get them to it. The CPU is not your problem; > >> DS> if you need more performance, you need to tune the I/O. (And possibly get > >> DS> better I/O cards, if available.) > >> > >> DS> Daniel T. Staal > >> > >> can I get interrupt limit or calculate it before that limit is > >> reached? > >> > >> interrupt source is internal card: > >> # vmstat -i > >> interrupt total rate > >> irq14: ata0 349756 78 > >> irq16: ehci0 7427 1 > >> irq23: ehci1 12150 2 > >> cpu0:timer 18268704 4122 > >> irq256: re0 85001260 19178 > >> cpu1:timer 18262192 4120 > >> cpu2:timer 18217064 4110 > >> cpu3:timer 18210509 4108 > >> Total 158329062 35724 > >> > >> Have you any good I/O tuning links to read? > >> > >> -- > >> С уважением, > >> Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru > w> > w> Your problem is in the poor performance LAN Card. Guy from > w> Calomel Org told you about it. He advised you to change to Intel Network Card. > > see at time 17:20 > http://piccy.info/view3/2404329/dd9f28f8ac74d3d2f698ff14c305fe31/ > > at this point freeradius start to work slow because of no CPU time is > allocated to it or is allocated to little and mpd5 start to drop users because of no response > from radius. I do not know what idle were on 'top', sadly. > > does SNMP return right values for CPU usage? > Here is some interesting articles about performance, mpd and others. Read it. http://dadv.livejournal.com/138951.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?66225.1324832585.13952326456075091968>