From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Mon Apr 10 09:18:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37A2D3785F; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 560F49DC; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from anthias.lan (windin2.lnk.telstra.net [165.228.56.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22F0E3F530; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:18:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 19:18:48 +1000 (AEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Andreas Tobler cc: Jan Beich , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r438061 - in head/lang: gcc/files gcc5/files gcc6/files In-Reply-To: <19d16784-4542-6186-158a-abda98a24374@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <201704081855.v38ItZH5002650@repo.freebsd.org> <19d16784-4542-6186-158a-abda98a24374@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:18:58 -0000 On Sun, 9 Apr 2017, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> Does this change the produced binary? If so bump PORTREVISION for >> package-only users to pick it up. poudriere by itself isn't smart >> enough to figure out. This is only for FreeBSD/AArch64 users of which there are not a whole lot and even less package-only I'd argue. So _I_ would not make this change (which affects 100x, 1000x users on other platforms), but... > I do not know offhand. I theory yes. To be on the safe side I agree > to bump the PORTREVISION. > > I'd like to have the ok from Gerald, he's on vacation atm. > Maybe he finds a minute to give an ok and then I would bump the > version of gcc/gcc5 and gcc6. ...I'm okay if you want to make it, Andreas. Gerald