Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:21:34 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@freebsd.org>, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r277694 - head/sys/amd64/conf
Message-ID:  <F4491618-77BF-46CB-BC9B-46CF5CB1195C@mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <ACD3E985-9D43-42B6-B141-CDA5AE61F517@bsdimp.com>
References:  <201501251202.t0PC2crJ029665@svn.freebsd.org> <CAE-mSOJtB19QA9rop_OnjNRagLdDw=Wi1y3OURtGnjBP=Mgg5A@mail.gmail.com> <6366BFE6-1A9F-433C-99F5-65B9D905AEF5@gmail.com> <ACD3E985-9D43-42B6-B141-CDA5AE61F517@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Don't have a strong opinion on this because I'm not in the know lately, =
but was wondering:

1) if we wanted to keep NE1000/2000 support for FreeBSD in emulators?  =
Probably not I assume?
2) Does Linux nuke these devices?  why/why-not?


On Jan 25, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Warner Losh wrote:

>=20
>> On Jan 25, 2015, at 7:54 AM, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Jan 25, 2015, at 04:43, Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@freebsd.org> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> On 25 January 2015 at 15:02, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav =
<des@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>> Author: des
>>>> Date: Sun Jan 25 12:02:38 2015
>>>> New Revision: 277694
>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277694
>>>>=20
>>>> Log:
>>>> Remove ISA NICs.  Anyone still using these on amd64 can build their
>>>> own kernel.
>>>>=20
>>>> Modified:
>>>> head/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC
>>>=20
>>> If so, what about i386? (I'd rather not pc98)
>>> What about device isa in DEFAULTS?
>>=20
>> isa is still needed in some scenarios. I just don't remember the full =
details offhand (something about internal buses iirc... And IPMI for =
starters...)
>=20
> "isa=94 in this context should be read as =93mainbus=94 not as =93ISA =
slots=94. You can=92t
> remove it without some significant work, and even then the interface =
changes
> to long established interfaces isn=92t worth the pain.
>=20
> Warner
>=20
>=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F4491618-77BF-46CB-BC9B-46CF5CB1195C>