Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:38:42 -0400 From: A Dude <adudek16@gmail.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: windowmaker 0.92 fails on amd64 Message-ID: <96ba9bee05080708386e9f5f41@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42F3FEC8.80509@FreeBSD.org> References: <200508060150.00580.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <42F3FEC8.80509@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have successfully compiled and installed this on my system which is an am=
d64.=20
Aaron
On 8/5/05, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Dejan Lesjak wrote:
>=20
> > I can test as well.
> > I tried earlier with this patch to Makefile:
> >=20
> > --- Makefile.orig Sat Aug 6 01:40:59 2005
> > +++ Makefile Sat Aug 6 01:41:04 2005
> > @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@
> > =20
> > .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
> > =20
> > +.if ${ARCH} =3D=3D amd64 =20
> > +CONFIGURE_ENV+=3D ac_cv_c_inline_asm=3Dno
> > +.endif
> > +
> > .if defined(WITH_XINERAMA) || defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING)
> > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D --enable-xinerama
> > .endif
>=20
> Ok, that's the kind of feedback I need. :) You said you tried, did it
> succeed? :)
>=20
> > and a patch to fix Qt based popup windows referenced here:
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-July/024661.html
> > and these worked so far.
>=20
> Sorry for my failure to understand you here. Are you saying that you trie=
d
> that patch on an amd64 system and it worked for you? If so, (and my testi=
ng
> proves that it doesn't harm 32 bit platforms), then I have no objection t=
o
> including it.
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Doug
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96ba9bee05080708386e9f5f41>