From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 14:37:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3804516A4CE; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B824F43D41; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:37:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004042721371301100plt7he>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:37:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA61444; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:37:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <58076.1083096035@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/boot0 Makefile boot0.sboot0_512.s boot0sio.s X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:37:19 -0000 On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20040427.131322.102770380.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: > > >Shouldn't this be boot0_512.S since it is pre-processed? It has been the convention since before I made the first bootblocks. The Makefiles know how to produce a .s from a .S using the C preprocessor. (or did I get this the other way around :-) > > If we have such a convention: yes. I wasn't aware of it. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >