Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Jan 1998 09:08:51 +0300 (MSK)
From:      =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/www/squid12 Makefile
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980121090424.432B-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
In-Reply-To: <199801210306.TAA07515@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Jan 1998, Peter Wemm wrote:

> peter       1998/01/20 19:06:06 PST
> 
>   Modified files:
>     www/squid12          Makefile 
>   Log:
>   Update this for the benefit of the new broken patch.  Tell it to look at
>   Index: like posix says, rather than going into dummy mode.  The distributed
>   patches are generated with standard cvs and don't have ache's hack (which
>   doesn't work when new files are added anyway).

As I say elsewhere please stop fixing something for new -current patch, we
NOT decide yet what to do with it. I.e. there is a chance you'll need to
back out you fix in case new patch goes to ports.

Our CVS hack is an extension, it is backward-compatible.
What you mean exactly by the words "which doesn't work when new files are
added"? Could you send me some examples?

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@nietzsche.net>
http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980121090424.432B-100000>