Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 09:08:51 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/squid12 Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980121090424.432B-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801210306.TAA07515@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Jan 1998, Peter Wemm wrote: > peter 1998/01/20 19:06:06 PST > > Modified files: > www/squid12 Makefile > Log: > Update this for the benefit of the new broken patch. Tell it to look at > Index: like posix says, rather than going into dummy mode. The distributed > patches are generated with standard cvs and don't have ache's hack (which > doesn't work when new files are added anyway). As I say elsewhere please stop fixing something for new -current patch, we NOT decide yet what to do with it. I.e. there is a chance you'll need to back out you fix in case new patch goes to ports. Our CVS hack is an extension, it is backward-compatible. What you mean exactly by the words "which doesn't work when new files are added"? Could you send me some examples? -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980121090424.432B-100000>