From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 15 04:09:46 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED5816A4CE
	for <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 04:09:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp0.euronet.nl (smtp0.euronet.nl [194.134.35.141])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1E343D32
	for <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 04:09:44 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com)
Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (zaphod.euronet.nl [194.134.168.213])
	by smtp0.euronet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4944224663; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:09:42 +0100 (MET)
From: Ernst de Haan <ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com>
Organization: Wanadoo Nederland B.V.
To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:09:47 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <20031213145040.GE13737@starjuice.net>
	<200312151155.58748.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com>
	<20031215105851.GQ13737@starjuice.net>
In-Reply-To: <20031215105851.GQ13737@starjuice.net>
X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200312151309.47345.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com>
cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Debugging options for tomcat41ctl
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:09:46 -0000

> Okay.  Now I'm on the same page as you.
>
> My question, then, is why are you imposing this feature requirement on
> these ports?  This feature isn't required by other ports that offer
> services.

I don't remember the exact history of things. All I do know is that people 
may rely on this now. And it's an improvement over su(do).

Ernst