From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 11:52:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FF21065672; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46698FC18; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q0JBqeen021680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:52:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q0JBqe29021679; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:52:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA29759; Thu, 19 Jan 12 03:41:49 PST Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:41:21 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: linimon@lonesome.com Message-Id: <4f1863d1.Fic+p76hZFab0jQU%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20120118222747.GA372@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120118222747.GA372@lonesome.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org, jgh@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:52:44 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:09:10PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > > I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with > > other people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if > > it's explicitly developed by Fedora. > > Correct. dougb has pointed this out before and no one has taken > the cycles to go act on it. Consider this a task that needs > volunteers. > > (A similiar caveat applies to the Debian and NetBSD sites; > I believe it was Debian he flagged previously.) Isn't this concern orthogonal to the original one about maintaining a (set of) correct MASTER_SITE setting(s), for use by such ports as can legitimately use Fedora/Debian/NetBSD/whatever sites?