From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Sep 4 1:24: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B561B37B405; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 01:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070344B20; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:24:00 +0900 (JST) To: Peter Pentchev Cc: Brian Somers , snap-users@kame.net, Shunsuke SHINOMIYA , freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org In-reply-to: roam's message of Tue, 04 Sep 2001 11:18:54 +0300. <20010904111854.D61594@ringworld.oblivion.bg> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 5335) Re: user-ppp assigns the address same with already assigned for other clients From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:24:00 +0900 Message-ID: <21829.999591840@itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> since KAME have never touched pppd for years, I don't think it >> is related to kame. > >KAME has not touched pppd, but Brian mentions later on in his message >that he thinks that the problem might be caused by the SIOCAIFADDR >ioctl, which was currently implemented using the SIOCAIFADDR_IN6 >ioctl during a KAME merge. you can't add IPv4 address with SIOCAIFADDR_IN6. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message