From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 27 12:37:36 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97235106566B;
	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:37:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E634A8FC0A;
	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:37:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2RCOHNh095382;
	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:24:17 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nagual.pp.ru;
	s=default; t=1269692658;
	bh=HvEdz31Jhxu7hEtToYd75+KSRJjbjNPUWWbM5wZhCkY=; l=589;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	Content-Type:In-Reply-To;
	b=Unc76wVGupDZ90lplSPEmMfefnNz+XRyWBV96VMks7ek9UxkhYVoDt4skUmf3JLO/
	+JWfJEuH90fNc7jo4vV8/LJYQ2JhR8v0G4HGcrhY8ZmUqGx0UioErEF1ZXS7meWM0H
	/vMR0LOsU1J+y7kPEguQXoMwqhEN1KQ+5na/R7Z8=
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o2RCOGmA095380;
	Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:24:16 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache)
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:24:14 +0300
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: d@delphij.net
Message-ID: <20100327122413.GA95235@nagual.pp.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, d@delphij.net,
	Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
	the_paya@gentoo.org, Alexander Logvinov <avl@logvinov.com>,
	freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <4BACFE18.7010309@delphij.net> <86wrwylji0.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<4BAD509B.3080805@delphij.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BAD509B.3080805@delphij.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no>,
	Alexander Logvinov <avl@logvinov.com>, the_paya@gentoo.org,
	freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: [RFC] Reduce namespace pollution on zlib.h
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:37:36 -0000

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:26:03PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> > This is wrong, FreeBSD has native 64-bit stat() etc. and does not need
> > _LARGEFILE_WHATEVER.
> 
> Yes we do not need that and it just cause compilation errors.
> 
> The problem is that some third party software thinks that they need to
> define _LARGEFILE64_*, which will break zlib.h on FreeBSD :(

To keep ports code untouched you should not #undef anything like that 
names in the public zlib.h header, just remove/redefine *LARGEFILE* for 
zlib only in some private internal header.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/