From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 5 14:45:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA02487 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:45:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA02481 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:45:25 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA00505; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:43:42 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199602052243.PAA00505@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: List Duplicates To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:43:42 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <96Feb5.130503pst.177478@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Feb 5, 96 01:04:58 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > In message <199602032144.OAA04394@phaeton.artisoft.com>you write: > >The list handler needs to write a reply-to that only includes the list > >and rewrite the cc line to remove people on the list (potentially > >removing the cc line entirely). > > No! Argh! Lists that include Reply-To: headers are *evil*, because it then > generally gets hard to reply just to the original author privately -- which > one might think would be good to encourage. > > People should just learn to trim their headers. Point of order: how do I tell which individual addresses in the current headers are or are not in the list addresses also in the current headers? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.