From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Jan 23 4:18:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from morpheus.skynet.be (morpheus.skynet.be [195.238.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A3C37B400; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 04:18:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.17.1.121] (warp-core.skynet.be [195.238.2.25]) by morpheus.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D8EDA69; Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:18:10 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: bs663385@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010123145129.N414@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <200101211447.f0LElEk04073@mobile.wemm.org> <20010121145018.A73989@citusc17.usc.edu> <20010121155556.B75159@citusc17.usc.edu> <20010122103659.A90890@citusc17.usc.edu> <20010123145129.N414@wantadilla.lemis.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:04:48 +0100 To: Greg Lehey From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: TV standards (was: VCD (was Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata atapi-cd.c)) Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 2:51 PM +1030 2001/1/23, Greg Lehey wrote: > There's no way you'd have any difficulty telling PAL from NTSC on the > same TV, even if they were optimally adjusted. The difference in > resolution is immediately obvious. This has not been my experience on all the various TVs I've looked at, but then I haven't been doing a full double-blind test with the same source displayed in two different formats on two examples of the exact same make & model of TV, both of which have been professionally adjusted to ensure that their output is as close to identical as possible. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message