From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 06:06:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF59BC58A3 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D836136F for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u7P66EAu031235 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:06:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 212132] [Hyper-V]Storage performance tuning for multiple threads on RAID0 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:06:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: honzhan@microsoft.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:06:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212132 --- Comment #2 from Hongjiang --- After the fix, the performance comparison with LIS are almost the same exce= pt for random write. 4k 8th randread randwrite read wri= te=20=20=20 IOdepth LIS BIS LIS BIS LIS BIS LIS BIS '1' 2749 2354.71 4551 2818.7 8100 4458.17 8230 4463.55 '16' 8333 8192.53 6656 5045.39 8161 8166.78 8588 8207.51 '32' 8274 8199.1 6642 4517.5 8160 8153.71 8526 8195.45 '64' 8295 8278.05 6621 4626.18 8172 8156.68 8459 8375.68 '128' 8298 8214.25 6429 4611.37 8197 8151.1 8267 8206.98 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=