From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 3 17:10:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63B837B41B for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:10:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id g041Ajg54093; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:10:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from arr@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: arr owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:10:44 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" X-Sender: arr@fledge.watson.org To: Terry Lambert Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: When to use atomic_ functions? (was: 64 bit counters) In-Reply-To: <3C34C840.6754F85A@mindspring.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG agreed. On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: :Julian Elischer wrote: :> It's interresti gthat the major antagonists here are all withon 70 km :> (Terry are you still in Foster City?) : :Yes... : :Of course, we are all *pro*tagonists, not *an*tagonists... : : :> why not just get together with a whiteboard somewhere (here?) :> and hack out the locking strategies over a few cups of coffee? : :Like the whole threads thing? : :I'm hesitant, since so many good ideas come from outside the :circle you describe; we really need better virtual presence :capability. I count 4 people on the "Cc:" of your (and this) :email who would not be able to attend in person, unless they :are on holiday in the U.S. right now... : :-- Terry : :To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org :with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message : -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message