Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 22:01:46 -0400 From: Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org> To: Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DPS Initial Ideas Message-ID: <17989.8202.624522.136573@bhuda.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <20070512004209.GA12218@lpthe.jussieu.fr> References: <20070512004209.GA12218@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In <20070512004209.GA12218@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr> typed: > One of the most obvious being that the sqlite database can be edited > as easily as a pure textfile using the sqlite3 program Huh? They can? With a pure textfile, if vi is busted, I can use ed. If ed is also busted, I can use sed. What do I use on an sqlite database if sqlite3 is busted? I'm currently reinstalling all the ports on my system, changing LOCALBASE from /usr/opt to /usr, just to see if this breaks anything. Adjusting all those pure textfile configs for this is trivial: find /etc /usr/etc /usr/X11R6/etc -type f | xargs sed -e 's;/opt;;g' -i .opt How can I do this "as easily" if I were using sqlite database(s)? <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17989.8202.624522.136573>