From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Jun 21 20:35:57 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FC915BEE30; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657BF80493; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:35:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7803917093; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:35:55 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: Jan Beich Cc: Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r504631 - head/audio/infamous-plugins-lv2 Message-ID: <20190621203555.GD29677@lonesome.com> References: <201906201521.x5KFLfZ3045705@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 657BF80493 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:35:58 -0000 On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:59:03PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > -Og is supported by GCC, just not by the ancient one in base. ;) > However, removing -Og (and -g) can be done on every architecture because > it'd enforce "respect CFLAGS" policy. OK, I've investigated a bit more. Unless you feel strongly about the situation, I feel like I will leave the change as it is. mcl