Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:55:51 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Joachim Dagerot <joachim@dagerot.nu> Cc: "C. Ulrich" <dincht@securenym.net> Subject: Re: Incremental backup solution. was: What logs etc do I need tocheckfrequently? Message-ID: <20031229095551.GE8047@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200312290935.hBT9Zo423698@thunder.trej.net> References: <200312282116.hBSLGHe13010@anon.securenym.net> <200312290935.hBT9Zo423698@thunder.trej.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 10:35:49AM +0100, Joachim Dagerot wrote:
> This solution sounds nice, I can even imagine setting up an additional
> machine (on the same location though) to have a somewhat galvanic
> isolation between the disks. Only fire, earthquake and a neutronbomb
> would affect such a backup solution.
Before certain events in New York, we used to talk about "hypothetical
jumbo jets" when considering our disaster plans. Secure off-site
backups are a necessity. Take care thought that the off-site location
really is secure. I did hear that some of the businesses in the World
Trade Center had considered "the other tower" as a suitable location
for their off-site backups.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/7/ondtESqEQa7a0RAuL4AJ9me0OzENht4Lgtqv+V+RIYbVpXNwCcDv5v
2csE7rTIXhGakE69HoGwQfM=
=B8fS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031229095551.GE8047>