Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 22:39:29 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Switching /etc/*.db from bdb to tinycdb Message-ID: <20120507203929.GS17325@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120507132325.c4bfae2d.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120502114115.GG31034@azathoth.lan> <20120507132325.c4bfae2d.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bGopQmzlzQgFk3Fg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:23:25PM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2012 13:41:15 +0200 > Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> mentioned: >=20 > >=20 > > Any opinion, ideas, advices on this? >=20 > Did you look at leveldb [1], btw? It seems to be very fast, better suppo= rted, and > support some advanced features that can be useful for other base applicat= ions > (like transactions, custom sorting, snapshots). >=20 > It's distributed under BSD license. >=20 > [1] http://code.google.com/p/leveldb/ >=20 Yes I had a look, and it doesn't fit imho: 1/ leveldb is c++ while for all our get*ent functions are in libc and needs= to acees the db files. 2/ leveldb is really huge compare to tinycdb. Btw: an unexpected gain of cdb is that for services for example the size of= the db is greatly reduces from 2M to 800K here, doesn't matter much but it is c= ool :) regards, Bapt --bGopQmzlzQgFk3Fg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+oMwEACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew5QwCfXbRKLZRpLBYsrY4wicBz1ACg EIkAn3T5RC8HJLO/XwwPFH35h4e19XiP =1MaB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bGopQmzlzQgFk3Fg--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120507203929.GS17325>