From owner-svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 21:19:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-branches@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AE6CA2BD7 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanilla@fatpipi.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x232.google.com (mail-ua0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FFD01CA3 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanilla@fatpipi.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 34so377322963uac.1 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:19:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fatpipi-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=WACvkjQE93K+KWLazQFrlYPBwT/SHj2EdMmt70FGW14=; b=luQjzfk0lBe6VSULYgBNJ1fj2WqE8HItwZdbptKQABOXP+ftY9TTP9X6AvDf/Iu0F0 d/2Rlz8RNNe6QhhyPhNHabKaFQPlmepVju8ag/cGfIvzw0L9a1stogUzkfA5BYgy65EI Lr5Zr1fmllbKktPRhVqCNfYt9KbMnb+iOBWjL4jfDWrycwWsGfrmIz+RlEM3+vuLC3Gt DQdIt7UetjyeeeNtWZNsaAU/JTxNdprQ/EutVLOUAnQYLpIQhv6RdnaPn9tXe657bq6o p04bAO3B6lArnsnMMOhMMlChh8klHtYAAVknRleuPpA0rda3H90IV+N7EUX364S2aihK 7wpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WACvkjQE93K+KWLazQFrlYPBwT/SHj2EdMmt70FGW14=; b=eJkASJmvo2uaHN7M9iqCQoZFZEoVfgnqaw44W2buwe1l7P3RtNBaRuE/feWQiPK4it h4kH8dLiQ/MJScl+NtxTvyXbaancaqqS/tQMu8dXUCSONInrp90nwIaGsIU/Y/HCZ0TN yRMTxCxof9drlzQnbb1aNkE0d6X4QS+iEp6dC+yUPYe2KgX1roBvV2CHMftQ2r47UAgT TNI/Fsh5Wp5LMC5BxjeGs16E/5BPRH1AJO5kCC4L7HX07tV15ddkySVwVXGkM+GK8Mc/ HCaEUVoQEemMJT9qTWHjHY95dMGMTK34lfNXN9IMQeYWTi4XsqjA9ReG3tXp/H0bYqqr Vriw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIkVVPn7foJL1amjh1OLr9WmFxRzjqM+kG3XowOdHGsp+CUlzodLpZuygLe2f36TxRyCL6GQU32SOrHBw== X-Received: by 10.176.66.227 with SMTP id j90mr61262658uaj.105.1483737554255; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:19:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.115.205 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:19:13 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: v@fatpipi.com In-Reply-To: <1483724375.450818.839569281.1B354AB3@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <201701060400.v0640oZm060190@repo.freebsd.org> <1483724375.450818.839569281.1B354AB3@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Vanilla Hsu Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 05:19:13 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r430688 - in branches/2017Q1/irc/irssi: . files To: Mark Felder Cc: "Vanilla I. Shu" , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" , "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" , svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the branches of the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:19:15 -0000 Sure, I will roll it back to 0.8.21 soon. 2017-01-07 1:39 GMT+08:00 Mark Felder : > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017, at 22:00, Vanilla I. Shu wrote: > > Author: vanilla > > Date: Fri Jan 6 04:00:50 2017 > > New Revision: 430688 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/430688 > > > > Log: > > MFH: r430686 > > > > Update to 1.0.0, also remove deprecated configure options. > > > > PR: 215800 > > Submitted by: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com > acheronmedia.com> > > > > I would have preferred to see us commit 0.8.21 to HEAD and MFH that, > then commit 1.0.0 to HEAD. 0.8.21 was a harmless security update, while > 1.0.0 brings a lot of change (in regards to the irssi world). In the > future please consider that we want quarterly branches to be stable for > both features *and* security. There are often exceptions such as > browsers and other software that users will expect to be the latest, but > irssi would have been fine to leave at 0.8.21 in quarterly for another 3 > months. > > I appreciate your work and effort to MFH; do not take this as a > criticism of your contributions. Just be mindful in the future of > potential POLA violations and other things that we could shake out in > HEAD first. > > Thanks! > > -- > Mark Felder > ports-secteam & portmgr member > feld@FreeBSD.org >