Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 21:20:03 -0800 (PST) From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/15434: new port: devel/kdevelop Message-ID: <199912150520.VAA57747@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/15434; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/15434: new port: devel/kdevelop Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 23:11:31 -0600 On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 01:00:03PM -0800, R. Imura wrote: > > o The port depends on many other ports. Year, if they are installed, > kdevelop will be more power-full and we will be happy, but they are > not really **nessesary**. This port would be exceptionally well served by the optional dependencies code that Jeremy Lea has been working on. See -ports for more details. > o If you say it is BROKEN for -stable( < 400004), defining USE_NEWGCC > doesn't make any sense. (I know it may have a sence in the future.) > I thought it being funny. Actually, this reminds me.. the USE_NEWGCC macro in bsd.port.mk is now out of date, it needs to be altered to < 400012 which was when gcc-2.95.2 became the default -current compiler (rev 1.56 of sys/sys/param.h) There's a few ports out there that have hacks to use the right gcc that can be removed now we can get the same compiler on both -stable and -current. textproc/aspell springs to mind :) -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912150520.VAA57747>