From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 20:05:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A296716A41F for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:05:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1AD43D45 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:05:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914A75FA2; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:05:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53742-05; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:05:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E112D5F8B; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:05:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4378EE15.6050505@mac.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:05:41 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <4378E1B9.8060509@mac.com> <20051114193625.GA80577@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051114193625.GA80577@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: FreeBSD - Ports Subject: Re: ruby version going backwards...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:05:40 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 02:12:57PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: [ ... ] >>Did PORTEPOCH get removed? > > No, as you can see there was no PORTEPOCH that was removed :) > > The ruby upgrade was reverted, but this has just caused further > problems :/ You're right: v1.89 has PORTEPOCH set, v1.88 does not. v1.88 should have had PORTEPOCH set so that ruby-1.8.3,1 > ruby-1.8.2_5,1, or was the point to roll back to 1.8.2 by setting PORTEPOCH? -- -Chuck % head -15 /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/Makefile # New ports collection makefile for: ruby18 # Date created: 6 May 2001 # Whom: Akinori MUSHA aka knu # # $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ruby18/Makefile,v 1.89 2005/11/14 09:46:15 sem Exp $ # PORTNAME= ruby PORTVERSION= ${RUBY_PORTVERSION} PORTREVISION= 5 PORTEPOCH= 1 CATEGORIES= lang ruby ipv6 MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_RUBY} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR_RUBY} DISTFILES= ${RUBY_DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} % head -15 /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/Makefile # New ports collection makefile for: ruby18 # Date created: 6 May 2001 # Whom: Akinori MUSHA aka knu # # $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ruby18/Makefile,v 1.88 2005/11/09 08:54:12 sem Exp $ # PORTNAME= ruby PORTVERSION= ${RUBY_PORTVERSION} CATEGORIES= lang ruby ipv6 MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_RUBY} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR_RUBY} DISTNAME= ${RUBY_DISTNAME} DIST_SUBDIR= ruby