From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 00:36:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B2716A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96CF344037 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:36:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 12710 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Sep 2003 09:33:10 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:33:10 +0000 From: Michal Pasternak To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20030929093310.GA12688@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Slashdot rejects "BSD is NOT dying" article X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:36:57 -0000 Robert Watson [Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 12:24:03PM -0400]: > In any case, I thought the results were interesting, and I think it's a > shame the editors of Slashdot felt that this material wasn't appropriate > for their forum... I seldom visit Slashdot, I saw it up a while ago. No wonder they didn't publish your material - they're too busy posting questions about MUD clients... Other OPN's site is newsforge.com. Maybe you should try there? -- m