From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  5 02:14:32 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E53C8DD1
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  5 Feb 2015 02:14:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC8AADE2
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  5 Feb 2015 02:14:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t152EWj8077106
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 02:14:32 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 197337] rc.d/kdc missing with WITHOUT_KERBEROS, but Kerberos
 ports need it
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 02:14:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: misc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: cy@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-197337-8-Om1SL07oRU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-197337-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-197337-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 02:14:33 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197337

Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|New                         |In Progress

--- Comment #2 from Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org> ---
The question is, should /etc/rc.d/kdc be the correct file or should the krb5
ports use their own file? I could argue it both ways but we should look at
existing and prior precedents such as,

- named (when it was still in base), bind9X ports
- sendmail (in base), sendmail (in ports), postfix, exim, etc...
- ntp (in base), ntp (in ports), and ntp-devel
- there are probably others that don't come to mind right now.

I'd like to keep the approach consistent across all classes of software.

Having said that, I can argue for ${LOCALBASE}/etc/rc.d/kdc if all other ports
do the same or if that is our direction. I think a bigger discussion is needed
to set the standard.

Thoughts?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.