From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 26 20:44:45 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE2C16A41C
	for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:44:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sascha@rincewind.c4inet.net)
Received: from rincewind.c4inet.net (rincewind.c4inet.net [193.120.144.209])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB17043D1D
	for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:44:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sascha@rincewind.c4inet.net)
Received: (qmail 51617 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Jun 2005 20:43:44 -0000
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:43:44 +0100
From: Sascha Luck <sascha@c4inet.net>
To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
Message-ID: <20050626204344.GA50599@saoirse.c4inet.net>
References: <20050626020825.GA45376@saoirse.c4inet.net>
	<200506261817.21799.max@love2party.net>
	<20050626164023.GC46138@saoirse.c4inet.net>
	<200506261950.00884.max@love2party.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200506261950.00884.max@love2party.net>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pfsync / 6-CURRENT-amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
	\(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:44:45 -0000

On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 07:49:54PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:

> It's just one of these days, I guess ... please use this patch instead or 
> remove the "&" in line 227.  Sorry.

Yep, that works fine. Cheers :)

s.