From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 10 6:53:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.163.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5704937B42C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 06:53:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) Received: from burns.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.19]) by krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A59A384A; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:53:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by burns.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 537) id 4DD1E13388; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:53:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:53:18 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Matthias Andree , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BDECFLAGS break current 4.x-stable build Message-ID: <20010410155318.A2074@burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> References: <20010409093630.B72961@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010409093630.B72961@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 09:36:30 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 09 Apr 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Submit patches to fix them, then. :-} Seriously, would these be relevant for 4.x-stable still or would these better be sent in for 5.x-current? > BDECFLAGS is there for developers to work on code correctness and > possible bugs resulting from language misuse (or general gcc pickiness > which doesn't actually involve code bugs). It doesn't change the code > generated by gcc. Yup, but now people looking through the archives have something to check if their build fails. That's been one reason for submitting this. :-) -- Matthias Andree To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message