From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 26 02:31:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA20139 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 02:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU (paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.34.47]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA20108 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 02:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost.Berkeley.EDU [127.0.0.1]) by paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA15909; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 02:30:55 -0700 From: Josh MacDonald Message-Id: <199609260930.CAA15909@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: Julian Elischer Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libstdc++ what-where-when? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Sep 1996 01:29:44 PDT." <324A3EF8.2781E494@whistle.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 02:30:54 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As of gcc-2.7, g++ splits libg++ into two libraries, one of GNU extensions and one of "standard" libraries (though there are still GNU extensions in libstdc++). libg++ still links with -lg++, and should not be neccesary for programs which fancy themselves portable c++ (there is no such thing). Is anyone working on bringing libg++ 2.7.2 into the tree? -josh > I'v enever seen this before.. > suddenly things here are breaking because its needed > > anyone know of it.. > I'm not into c++ personally but.. > > > > julian >