From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 21 16:45:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A2837B401; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B275B43FA3; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:45:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2B978C9C; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:45:53 +0200 (MEST) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 356A99652F; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:45:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (dwp.des.no [10.0.0.4]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 169939636F; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:45:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id C6A88B822; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:45:48 +0200 (CEST) To: Peter Wemm References: <20030721220459.37E8E2A8B2@canning.wemm.org> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:45:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030721220459.37E8E2A8B2@canning.wemm.org> (Peter Wemm's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:04:59 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=8.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Mark Murray cc: i386@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 23:45:56 -0000 Peter Wemm writes: > Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, a= nd > is rather consistent. "told you so" > So, who has been messing with make(1) lately? I believe that the problem is in the kernel, not in make(1); it just happens to be triggered by make(1) because it is a big (if not the biggest) vfork(2) consumer. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no