From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 25 07:20:34 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206E916A589
	for <freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:20:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143A443D64
	for <freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:20:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8P7KRs0067224
	for <freebsd-standards@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:20:27 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8P7KRf0067223;
	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:20:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:20:27 GMT
Message-Id: <200609250720.k8P7KRf0067223@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
From: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: standards/99926: [Patch] [sh(1)'s jobs] POSIX compliancy by
	adding -p switch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:20:34 -0000

The following reply was made to PR standards/99926; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>
To: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Maxim Konovalov <maxim@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: standards/99926: [Patch] [sh(1)'s jobs] POSIX compliancy by adding -p switch
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:15:03 +0200

 --FhHtzeYSSYv4Pwk7
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 * Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
 > > * Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
 > > > IMHO, this patch is wrong. You just print the actual PID of the proce=
 ss,
 > > > not the PID of the group leader.
 > > >=20
 > > > I have a simular patch, which however prints PID of the group obtained
 > > > with getpgid() for the appropriate process:
 > > >=20
 > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/patches/freebsd/src_bin_sh_jobs_p.di=
 ff
 > >=20
 > > It prints the PID of the first process, which is the process group
 > > leader.
 >=20
 > Hm, sorry, I missed that part of the patch. However I wasn't able to
 > find out if the PID of the first process in group is the process group
 > leader in the docs. Is there any difference between getpgrp() and first
 > PID of the group?
 
 No, process groups are identified by the process ID of the group leader.
 
 --=20
  Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>
  WWW: http://g-rave.nl/
 
 --FhHtzeYSSYv4Pwk7
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
 
 iD8DBQFFF4H252SDGA2eCwURAhN3AJ9ZkChu/MlZYqjaTynjbqbXgp/xNACfYWIX
 eW3S72rWkQdjynK9KcrhgAA=
 =iqPR
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --FhHtzeYSSYv4Pwk7--