From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 30 23:50:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8AE36B for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidch@broadcom.com) Received: from mms3.broadcom.com (mms3.broadcom.com [216.31.210.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB5561B for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.9.208.27] by mms3.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.5)); Thu, 30 May 2013 16:39:45 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: B86B6450-0931-4310-942E-F00ED04CA7AF Received: from IRVEXCHMB11.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [fe80::9cdd:3a57:8694:f610]) by irvexchmb05.corp.ad.broadcom.com ( [::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Thu, 30 May 2013 16:48:33 -0700 From: "David Christensen" To: "Herve Boulouis" Subject: RE: Support of Dell M620 broadcom BCM57810 Thread-Topic: Support of Dell M620 broadcom BCM57810 Thread-Index: AQHOXG8wryApyoZbf0uvl6Vj8f1Wo5kc5ibwgAEHS4CAAHha0A== Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 23:48:32 +0000 Message-ID: <3A5015FE9E557D448AF7238AF0ACE20A36E8C3@IRVEXCHMB11.corp.ad.broadcom.com> References: <20130529131313.GA24559@ra.aabs> <3A5015FE9E557D448AF7238AF0ACE20A36DE66@IRVEXCHMB11.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <20130530093137.GB24559@ra.aabs> In-Reply-To: <20130530093137.GB24559@ra.aabs> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.9.208.64] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 7DB93CCB2L825162045-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" , Gary Zambrano X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 23:50:51 -0000 > I'll be glad to test but I'd like to know : >=20 > - do you require testing on -head or -stable ? Tested with 9.1 and 10.0-Current. Open to patches on earlier kernels for the brave. > - in your opinion in which shape is the current code ? I mean how far are= we > from something more or less ready to put > in production ?=20 It's not extensively tested across all NICs yet (BCM57711E in an HP blade system, BCM57810 w/ 10GBase-T PHY, etc. ) so some hardware specific combinations may not work, but otherwise it's in good shape. Really just needs some wider test before committing to the kernel. Dave