From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 26 03:54:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B84A16A41C for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 03:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FFD43D48 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 03:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Db9PL-0004wY-Q7 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 05:51:43 +0200 Received: from pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.83.169.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 05:51:43 +0200 Received: from apeiron+usenet by pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 05:51:43 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Christopher Nehren Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 03:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Organization: /usr/bin/false Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <87d4647e0505251354775d255c@mail.gmail.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp08490587pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: Hs-opengl X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 03:54:11 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-05-25, Ron scribbled these curious markings: > The port Hs-opengl is out of date. It still depends on ghc5, and I > guess that should be ghc6(6.4 to be exact). And? How about updating it? If ports@freebsd.org is marked as the maintainer of the port, then that means that it doesn't have a maintainer. Think of it as an unofficial invitation and request to stand up and take maintainership of the port. Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFClUg0k/lo7zvzJioRAjNSAJwN+Y8vAPaPzmV/xJvRC3emq7zxqACgnvr+ BAqabpGrUNJ2yFN/4hPEvYw= =4pzz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong people questions, you get "Joel on Software". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly.