From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar  7 18:42:47 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED7816A406
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Mar 2007 18:42:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCCE13C4B7
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Mar 2007 18:42:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.4])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1HP15z-000761-Tr; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:42:40 +0300
Message-ID: <45EF0778.9080400@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:42:00 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070124)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rotkap@gmx.de
References: <2lm2c4-1h1.ln1@news.hansenet.de>
In-Reply-To: <2lm2c4-1h1.ln1@news.hansenet.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Whats this: UPDATING 2007030
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:42:47 -0000

Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> 
> sorry I do not understand, WHAT to do there.
> 
> Okay, there is an example, but what doas this mean concretely to me?
> 
> Does that mean, that I am responsible fu"r all deps in ports? 
> That cannot be? is it?
> 

I think you can just ignore it if you don't understand. It's safe in the
case. Do not run pkgdb -L. Dependencies will restore after a few upgrades.

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.