From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 5 8:18:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7A837B422 for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 08:18:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA10376; Sat, 5 May 2001 11:18:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.3/8.9.1) id f45FI9l71418; Sat, 5 May 2001 11:18:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15092.6577.733823.946525@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 11:18:09 -0400 (EDT) To: Daniel Eischen Cc: Bruce Evans , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel Eischen writes: > > OK, thanks. Here's my guess at what should be changed for the Linux > emulator. If this looks correct, I'll commit it. > > Hmm, I wonder how linuxthreads works under FreeBSD without this > change... > This breaks at least one version of the IBM JDK that I have laying around.. If anything, we may have two errors (at least partially) canceling each other out. I think it needs more work/thought prior to committing. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message