From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 19 03:05:26 2012
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB36106566C;
	Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:05:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7828FC13;
	Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:05:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id E1A955620E; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:05:25 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:05:25 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20120219030525.GC6927@lonesome.com>
References: <201202190018.q1J0IYeQ064405@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20120219013050.GA6927@lonesome.com>
	<20120219013638.GD1828@glenbarber.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120219013638.GD1828@glenbarber.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:05:26 -0000

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 08:36:38PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> Ah, thanks for the info.  What I meant though was it was
> packages-9-current instead of packages-10-current.

The takeaway is that we want people to use the packages-9-stable link
now.  (pkg_install in head has been fixed to point to that.)

> Ok, I'll remove the packages-10-current link then.

Well, not necessary, they will show up at some point.

mcl