From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 2 7:17: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from shale.csir.co.za (shale.csir.co.za [146.64.46.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91E614D77 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 07:15:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reg@shale.csir.co.za) Received: (from reg@localhost) by shale.csir.co.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA38647; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:13:25 +0200 (SAT) (envelope-from reg) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 17:13:25 +0200 From: Jeremy Lea To: Alexander Sanda Cc: "David O'Brien" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc Message-ID: <19990302171325.B303@shale.csir.co.za> References: <19990301221320.A13579@relay.nuxi.com> <3642.990302@compufit.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <3642.990302@compufit.at>; from Alexander Sanda on Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 03:25:20PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 03:25:20PM +0100, Alexander Sanda wrote: > Maybe. But what if Netscape decides to make the next fbsd release ELF > (and still keeps linking with libg++) ? > > What about Mozilla ? Is it libg++ - free ? > > I agree that libg++ is (almost) useless today, but dropping it from the > source and making it a port shouldn't disturb anyone. Mozilla will only be ELF, since it is very likely that the minumum compiler will be egcs. It will also need GTK+, not Motif. I'm surprised the old Netscape needed libg++... Regards, -Jeremy -- | "Come home my prodigal son, come home and lets be one, --+-- don't want to see you cry, don't make me tell you why, | you've lived in a house with me, my blood has set you free, | in the world you'll surely die, nothing else will satisfy." -MIC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message