Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 03:51:44 +0900 From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> To: snap-users@kame.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 8793) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE Message-ID: <y7vzn3fijpb.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409242032040.17234-100000@netcore.fi> References: <y7vfz57k5qw.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409242032040.17234-100000@netcore.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:39:32 +0300 (EEST), >>>>> Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> said: >> 1. do you see massive number of entries with "netstat -rna"? > Yes. > # netstat -nra | wc -l > 32468 > # Okay, to be sure, most of them are IPv6 routing entries, right? Then please provide some additional information. 1. the result of netstat -rnal. A digest of the output is probably enough, but if you could provide the entire output (on the web, for example) it would also be helpful. 2. how did you configure the route to the stf interface? I guess you installed some static route for 2002::/16 to the interface. The command line argument (or the rc.conf parameters) that made the route and the corresponding route entry shown by netstat -rn are both helpful. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?y7vzn3fijpb.wl>