From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 20 15:31:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.go2france.com (go2france.com [209.51.193.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92475154B4 for ; Thu, 20 May 1999 15:31:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lconrad@Go2France.com) Received: from dell01 [195.68.2.31] by mail.go2france.com (SMTPD32-4.03) id A959720172; Thu, 20 May 1999 17:06:33 EST5EDT Message-Id: <4.1.19990521001440.00deee00@mail.go2france.com> X-Sender: lconrad@mail.go2france.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 00:25:44 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: Can this routing be done under fbsd? In-Reply-To: <199905131611.UAA02012@hq.spc.high> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We're a 'boutique/niche' ISP that has acquired a small block of public ip addresses. Is NAT the way to do this: Our border gateway router (one link to an Internet backbone) will be freebsd, with the DMZ net just behind it. Assume the DMZ net will be private with 10.0.0.*. A 2nd fbsd machine on the DMZ net will be our "dedicated access router" driving HDLC WAN cards and dedicated leased lines to our customers, some of whom will have servers with public ip addresses. Assume the WAN side of the access router will have private addresses lke 192.0.0.*. What's the best way, if possible with fbsd, to have the clients' public servers accessible via public ip addresses. 2 levels of static NAT? Thanks, Len To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message