From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jun  1 04:23:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA22667
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 1 Jun 1996 04:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA22655
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Jun 1996 04:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from imb@localhost)
          by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.7.5/BSD4.4) id VAA13315
          Sat, 1 Jun 1996 21:22:48 +1000 (EST)
From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199606011122.VAA13315@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Ignore Query about tun0 and In/Out Packets...
To: scrappy@ki.net (Marc G. Fournier)
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 21:22:47 +1000 (EST)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.93.960531160426.5135A-100000@ki.net> from "Marc G. Fournier" at May 31, 96 04:05:33 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Marc G. Fournier writes:

> 	I just checked, and I *think* that I'm misunderstanding what
> snmpget does (or its broken in ucd-snmp)...snmpwalk updates properly,
> snmpget doesn't...

No, you're misunderstanding what (CMU) snmpd does .. it caches the last
response until some other query is made.
 
> 	Not a FreeBSD problem either way...

Indeed,

	michael