Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:49:46 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: jandrese@mitre.org, aa878@columbia.edu, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.x Message-ID: <200201241249.g0OCnlc20786@Magelan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <3C4F5656.8E1E4960@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Jan, Terry Lambert wrote:
>> [gcc 3.0.x bug]
>> > Actually, that was against 3.0 at -O2.
>> >
>> > If that's been fixed, I guess we can cut over, as soom as the
>> > non-x86 code generation for our other supported platforms
>> > works again (tried compiling your RedHat for Alpha lately?).
>>
>> gcc 3.0.3 has problems with "-O3 -funroll-loops", "-O -funroll-loops" or
>> "-O3" without "-funroll-loops" seems to work. Someone told me the CVS
>> version of gcc has a fix for this.
>
>
> Someone told me that the only place you can get CVS versions
> of GCC are by installing RedHat Linux. 8-) 8-) 8-).
:-)
> Why don't we wait until there is a GCC release that actually
> works?
It wasn't my intention to suggest to use a CVS version of GCC.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201241249.g0OCnlc20786>