From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Aug 21 10:12:09 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id KAA00502
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 10:12:09 -0700
Received: from haywire.DIALix.COM (haywire.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.65])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA00493
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 10:12:05 -0700
Received: (from news@localhost) by haywire.DIALix.COM (8.7.Beta.11/8.7.Beta.11/DIALix) id BAA10842 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 01:11:59 +0800 (WST)
Received: from GATEWAY by haywire.DIALix.COM with netnews
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org (problems to: usenet@haywire.dialix.com)
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: 22 Aug 1995 01:11:55 +0800
From: peter@haywire.dialix.com (Peter Wemm)
Message-ID: <41aeor$ain$1@haywire.DIALix.COM>
Organization: DIALix Services, Perth, Australia.
References: <95Aug21.074148pdt.177475@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: make world fails
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) writes:

>My very first "make world" ever fell over; since the new version of bind
>was just imported I'm somewhat suspicious that it's actually not something
>dumb that I'm doing...

>===> libresolv
>cc -O -DDEBUG -DLIBC_SCCS -c /usr/src/lib/libresolv/../libc/net/gethostnamadr.c
>-o gethostnamadr.o
>cc -O -DDEBUG -DLIBC_SCCS -c /usr/src/lib/libresolv/../libc/net/res_mkquery.c -o
> res_mkquery.o
>/usr/src/lib/libresolv/../libc/net/res_mkquery.c:68: res_config.h: No such file
>or directory
>*** Error code 1 


>There is indeed a res_config.h in ../libc/net/, but no include path for it...

>  Bill

Yep. It was a braino on my part..  Very sorry..

I wasn't aware of the existance of libresolv..  Since the entire
resolver was in libc, the thought never occurred to me to see if it
was built elsewhere...

If you rerun your sup or ctm, you'll it'll work..

As for your make world, if it got to the second pass of building the
libraries, you should be able to simply continue where it left off
with "make all install"..   If it hasn't built a new gcc and libc yet,
you'd best let it start from scratch again... :-(

-Peter (hanging head in shame..)