From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Apr 30 8:57:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from rack.purplecat.net (rack.purplecat.net [208.133.44.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C802437B405 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21356 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2002 15:57:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO micron) (208.150.25.130) by rack.purplecat.net with SMTP; 30 Apr 2002 15:57:33 -0000 From: "Peter Brezny" To: "Forrest W. Christian" , "Peter Brezny" Cc: Subject: RE: Help host resolution mixup. Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:57:36 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 In-Reply-To: <20020430091200.X32964-100000@workhorse.imach.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thanks a lot for the help Forrest. For freebsd isp related problems, I've always had helpful support from this list, I'm glad to see that the positive supportive environment still exists here. Here's an example of the problem I am seeing: Two domains both using ns1 and ns2.purplecat.net as their name servers. domains registered at a registrar _other than_ networksolutions don't list ip addresses related to ns1 and ns2.purplecat.net for example: whois agrnews.org Domain Name: AGRNEWS.ORG Registrar: CORE INTERNET COUNCIL OF REGISTRARS Whois Server: whois.corenic.net Referral URL: http://www.corenic.net Name Server: NS1.PURPLECAT.NET Name Server: NS2.PURPLECAT.NET Updated Date: 24-apr-2002 domains registered at networksolutions.com provide incorrect ip addresses for ns1 and ns2.purplecat.net even thought he forward lookup for these hosts works fine, _and_ modifying the information for barbarafield.org with the correct ip addresses at networksolutions does not fix the problem, even though it claims that the update went through successfully: whois barbarafield.org Domain Name: BARBARAFIELD.ORG Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com Name Server: NS1.PURPLECAT.NET Name Server: NS2.PURPLECAT.NET Updated Date: 05-nov-2001 ... Domain servers in listed order: NS1.PURPLECAT.NET 209.16.228.148 NS2.PURPLECAT.NET 209.16.228.149 However: dig @a.gtld-servers.net. ns1.purplecat.net ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> @a.gtld-servers.net. ns1.purplecat.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6 ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; ns1.purplecat.net, type = A, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: ns1.purplecat.net. 2D IN A 208.133.44.46 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: purplecat.net. 2D IN NS ns1.purplecat.net. purplecat.net. 2D IN NS NS2.purplecat.net. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns1.purplecat.net. 2D IN A 208.133.44.46 NS2.purplecat.net. 2D IN A 208.133.44.47 I've sent an e-mail to networksolutions with the same question but have not heard back from them (surprise). Peter Brezny purplecat.net -----Original Message----- From: Forrest W. Christian [mailto:forrestc@imach.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:18 AM To: Peter Brezny Cc: Doug Barton; freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Help host resolution mixup. On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Peter Brezny wrote: > I can't really think of a more appropriate list for this kind of question > than the freebsd-isp list, please let me know if there is one, however... The dns-related newsgroups come to mind, that said... > I guess the to-the-point question that I have is, is it a requirement to > have proper reverse resolution for nameservers? Yes and no. In theory everything should work right. In reality nameservers occasionally get confused about their role in life and stop working. And when this occurs it usually is a problem with the local nameservers. I think Peter's other (implied) guess might be that there is something seriously broken in the forward delegation of your domains, which (if it is the case) should be taken up with the appropriate registrar. If you post the actual domains and what brokenness you are seeing (perhaps one that works vs one that doesn't work) generally someone on here will do a couple of digs and be able to tell you where to look for the cause. Saying "I'm doing something nonstandard, will this break anything?" will probably get you more of the responses you got... I.E. we're not experts at every concievable DNS mangling, try some other list. - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Innovation Machine Ltd. P.O. Box 5749 http://www.imach.com/ Helena, MT 59604 Home of PacketFlux Technogies and BackupDNS.com (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Protect your personal freedoms - visit http://www.lp.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message