From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 16:36:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65D7106566B for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@weta.stanford.edu) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (smtp3.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D41C8FC1A for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DBA4D8118; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from weta.stanford.edu (weta.Stanford.EDU [128.12.181.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34BAD8057; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ian by weta.stanford.edu with local (Exim 4.74 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QrBlA-000KlN-MU; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:00 -0700 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:00 -0700 From: Ian Downes To: Steven Hartland Message-ID: <20110810163600.GA77840@weta.stanford.edu> References: <20110810021750.GA83262@weta.stanford.edu> <20110810160047.GA74133@weta.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: Ian Downes Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umounting md backed jail filesystems - busy X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:36:01 -0000 > > $ jls > > JID IP Address Hostname Path > > What does jls -d say? i.e. is the jail really shutdown or is it still dieing? Thanks, indeed jls -d does show the jail as in the process of dying. I watched jls -d and (unscientifically) as soon as jls -d reported the jail was completely dead I was able to umount and destroy the filesystem. I hadn't expected it to take a minute or more for a jail to die. Is this usual? Can anyone suggest what may be causing this? Perhaps a network related timeout? thanks, Ian