From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 4 06:14:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA28814 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 06:14:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Thingol.KryptoKom.DE (Thingol.KryptoKom.DE [194.245.91.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA28796; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 06:14:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Etienne.Debruin@KryptoKom.DE) Received: (from mail@localhost) by Thingol.KryptoKom.DE (8.8.7/8.8.4) id PAA00402; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 15:15:01 +0100 Received: from cirdan.kryptokom.de by via smtpp (Version 1.1.1beta6) id kwa00398; Wed Nov 04 15:14:54 1998 Received: by Cirdan.KryptoKom.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA17373; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 15:13:17 +0100 Received: (from debruin@localhost) by borg.kryptokom.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA04355; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 15:16:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from debruin) From: Etienne de Bruin Message-Id: <199811041416.PAA04355@borg.kryptokom.de> Subject: waiting in device driver To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG (Hackers FreeBSD), questions@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Mailing List) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 15:16:24 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG which is the best way to wait for the DMA routines of a card to complete? should one go in a while loop and test a flag (which gets set by the interrupt handler once completed) or should i go for the tsleep option? eT -- Etienne de Bruin, KryptoKom(R), Germany, http://www.kryptokom.de/ eT@kryptokom.de or edebruin@iname.com +49 241 963 2635(w) "i'll pluck the thorns out from your feet, you and me" - rem, be mine. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message