From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 20:13:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261D0885 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D31DB353 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMMcB-0007x5-NA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:13:27 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.82.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:13:27 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:13:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: Clarifications on ACPI driver Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:13:20 -0500 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <54D25DF1.9030603@netfence.it> <54DA8C63.8000303@netfence.it> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:13:38 -0000 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 02/04/15 21:50, Michael Powell wrote: >> Andrea Venturoli wrote: [snip] >> >> This is only so for the 32-bit i386 build. You will not see this in the >> 64- bit x86_64 build. > > Uh??? [snip] >> >> # grep -i acpi sys/i386/conf/GENERIC >> device acpi >> # grep -i acpi sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC >> device acpi >> options ACPI_DMAR >> # > > As you can see "device acpi" is present in both i386's and amd64's > GENERIC. I was wondering why on earth there was so much difference between what you were reporting and what I was seeing. Turns out you are indeed completely correct. I had originally cut-and-pasted the 'device acpi' into the Kate (GUI KDE editor) search feature "Find" and it returned nothing. Various permutations don't work either, and using 'acpi' as the search term is the only one that actually found these entries in the GENERIC .conf file(s). When using CLI commands such as above it works as expected. This is some form of regression in Kate - I have done things like this for such a long time I expected it to still "Just Work", only now it does not. Some kind of problem parsing the gap between the two words. Used to work; now it's broken. Sigh... -Mike