From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 13:44:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4867C16A4CE for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF3543D31 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:44:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mvh@ix.netcom.com) Received: from lsanca1-ar6-4-62-201-246.lsanca1.elnk.dsl.genuity.net ([4.62.201.246] helo=netcom1.netcom.com) by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AkVaB-0000eo-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:44:48 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netcom1.netcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFBA55B5 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:44:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from netcom1.netcom.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netcom1.netcom.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72424-03; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:44:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by netcom1.netcom.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0DD0055B3; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:44:45 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Harding To: mvh@ix.netcom.com In-reply-to: <20040124212805.8E3E955B7@netcom1.netcom.com> (message from Mike Harding on Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:28:05 -0800 (PST)) References: <20040124212805.8E3E955B7@netcom1.netcom.com> Message-Id: <20040124214445.0DD0055B3@netcom1.netcom.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 13:44:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ix.netcom.com cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_4 -> RELENG_4_9 sidegrade problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:44:49 -0000 Actually, I was having problems around June 2003 (same problem, signal 10 in cc1) so it's possible that there is code around this date in -stable that got into 4.9 and was later fixed. I'll just keep running RELENG_4 for now, it seems rock-solid. I am just running a few jails now so I would rather have a more "stable" system, release-wise. - Mike H.