From owner-freebsd-newbies Sun Dec 19 10:22:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from milkyway.org (lta-r-1.usit.net [205.241.194.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C58A15187 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 1999 10:22:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toby@milkyway.org) Received: from rigel (rigel.milkyway.org [205.241.194.19]) by milkyway.org (8.8.8/8.8.3) with SMTP id NAA04554; Sun, 19 Dec 1999 13:14:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001701bf49e9$8991bae0$13c2f1cd@milkyway.org> From: "Toby J. Swanson" To: Cc: Subject: squid on small LANs Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 01:23:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone set up squid (proxy server/accelerator) in a small office (5-10 clients) environment? If so, was it worth the trouble? Can you actually see URLs load faster? I'm considering using it on a Pentium II running FreeBSD 3.3, 256Mb RAM, 4Gb fast wide SCSI cache area on a 100Mbps switched LAN with 4 to 10 Windows 95/98 clients. I'm not asking for tech help, just looking for "it worked for me", "not worth the effort", "6 of one half-a-dozen of the other" type experiences or your comments on squid or alternatives. Thanks, Toby To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message